Different Nitrogen Rates and Methods of Application for Dry Season Rice cultivation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation: Fate of Nitrogen and Grain Yield

AuthorS.M. Mofijul Islam
AuthorYam Kanta Gaihre
AuthorJatish Chandra Biswas
AuthorMd. Sarwar Jahan
AuthorUpendra Singh
AuthorSanjoy Kumar Adhikary
AuthorM. Abdus Satter
AuthorMohammad Saleque
Date of acession2023-09-11T14:28:17Z
Date of availability2023-09-11T14:28:17Z
Date of issue2018
AbstractImprovement of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is a challenging task because of its several losses 3 through ammonia volatilization, surface runoff, leaching and nitrification-denitrification. Fertilizer deep placement (FDP) has been proven effective in increasing grain yields and NUE under continuous standing water (CSW) condition. However, the impacts of FDP have not been investigated under alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation. Field experiments were conducted in the dry seasons during 2014-2016 to determine the interaction effect of fertilizer x water regime on N losses as floodwater ammonium and ammonia volatilization, grain yields and NUE. Broadcast prilled urea (PU), deep placement of urea briquettes (UB) and nitrogen phosphorus-potassium fertilizer briquettes (hereafter NPK) at varied N rates and zero N were tested under AWD and CSW conditions. The deep placement of UB and NPK, irrespective of N rates and water regimes, reduced floodwater ammonium and ammonia volatilization significantly compared to broadcast PU. Deep placement of either UB-N78 or NPK-N104 increased grain yields under both AWD (21- 15 26%) and CSW (13-20%) conditions compared to broadcast PUN104. The magnitude of increase was larger under AWD, because AWD significantly reduced grain yields (8%) compared to CSW at PU-N104. However, yields of deep-placed UB were similar between AWD and CSW. Deep placement of UB and NPK increased N recovery up to 57-66% from 36% of PUN104. These results suggest that UBN78 and NPK-N104 can be utilized under AWD not only for increased grain yield and NUE but also to reduce additional pumping cost for irrigation water. Moreover, combined approach of AWD and FDP might be a good option for improving water and fertilizer use efficiencies in rice cultivation.
CitationIslam, S.M.M., Y.K. Gaihre, J.C. Biswas, M.S. Jahan, U. Singh, S.K. Adhikary, M.A. Satter, and M.A. Saleque. 2018. “Different Nitrogen Rates and Methods of Application for Dry Season Rice Cultivation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation: Fate of Nitrogen and Grain Yield,” Agricultural Water Management, 196:144-153.
URLhttps://hub.ifdc.org/handle/20.500.14297/2455
Languageen_US
SubjectDeep placement
SubjectIrrigation
SubjectNitrogen-use efficiency
TitleDifferent Nitrogen Rates and Methods of Application for Dry Season Rice cultivation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation: Fate of Nitrogen and Grain Yield
TypeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0378377417303542-am.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Collections