Journal Articles
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Journal Articles by Author "A. Buerkert"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemCereal/legume Rotation Effects on Cereal Growth in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa: Soil Mineral Nitrogen, Mycorrhizae and Nematodes(2000-01) M. Bagayoko; A. Buerkert; G. Lung; Andre Bationo; V. RömheldYield increases of cereals following legumes in rotation have been previously reported for West Africa, but little progress has been made to explain the mechanisms involved. At four sites in Niger and Burkina Faso, field trials with pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) were conducted from 1996 to 1998 to investigate the role of soil mineral nitrogen (Nmin), native arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) and nematodes in cereal/legume rotations. Grain and total dry matter yields of cereals at harvest were increased by legume/cereal rotations at all sites. Soil Nmin levels in the topsoil were consistently higher in cereal plots previously sown with legumes (rotation cereals) compared with plots under continuous cereal cultivation. However, these rotation effects on Nmin were much larger with groundnut than with cowpea. Roots of rotation cereals also had higher early AM infection rates compared to continuous cereals. The dominant plant-parasitic nematodes found in all experiment fields were Helicotylenchus sp., Rotylenchus sp. and Pratylenchus sp. In sorghum/groundnut cropping systems, nematode densities were consistently lower in rotation sorghum compared to continuous sorghum. Continuous groundnut had the lowest nematode densities indicating that groundnut was a poor host for the three nematode groups. In millet/cowpea cropping systems with inherently high nematode densities, crop rotations barely affected nematode densities indicating that both crops were good hosts. These results suggest that on the nutrient poor Sudano-Sahelian soils of our study, total dry matter increases of rotation cereals compared with continuous cereals can be explained by higher Nmin and AM infection levels early in the season. The site-specific magnitude of these effects may be related to the efficiency of the legume species to suppress nematode populations and increase plant available N through N2-fixation.
- ItemEfficient Phosphorus Application Strategies for Increased Crop Production in Sub- Saharan West Africa(2001) A. Buerkert ; Andre Bationo; Hans-Peter PiephoGreenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the agronomic effectiveness of Panda Hills phosphate rock (PPR) from southwest Tanzania, its mixture with triple superphosphate (TSP), and a compacted mixture of Panda PR and TSP (PPR+TSP) for wheat, rape, maize, and soybean on two United States soils (Hiwassee and Windthorst). The mixture of Panda PR and TSP was prepared by mixing ground TSP with Panda PR in proportions such that 50% of the total phosphorus (P) in the final mixture was from TSP. The compacted product (PPR+TSP) was prepared by compacting some of the blended mixture of Panda PR and TSP into pellets using a laboratory scale Carver press followed by crushing and screening. The P rates applied to Hiwassee soil were 0, 25, 50, and 100 mg P kg for each P source and test crop while on Windthorst soil only one rate of application (50 mg P kg) was applied to one test crop (rape). A lime treatment was also included on the Windthorst soil to enable evaluation of rape response to the different P sources under calcareous conditions. Wheat and rape were allowed to grow to maturity while maize and soybean were grown for six weeks only. The performance of the P sources as reflected by yield, P uptake and relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) followed the order TSP>>(PPR+TSP)>(PPR)+(TSP)>>PPR for wheat, rape, maize, and soybean on Hiwassee soil. Panda PR was very ineffective in increasing grain or dry‐matter yields of the test crops on this soil. The mixture of Panda PR and TSP as well as the compacted product increased wheat, maize, and soybean yields and P uptake significantly. The increases in yields were, however, largely attributed to the TSP component of the (PPR)+(TSP) mixture or its compacted product with little or no contribution from PPR. On the alkaline Windthorst soil, the performance of the P sources as reflected by rapeseed yield and RAE followed the order TSP= (PPR+TSP)>(PPR)+(TSP)>PPR. Remarkably compacted PPR and TSP was at par with TSP while PPR alone was 50% as effective as TSP in increasing rapeseed yield. Addition of lime drastically reduced the effective‐ness of Panda PR, but it had little or no effect on the agronomic effectiveness of the (PPR)+(TSP) mixture or its compacted product.